|
Gloves Off Over Boxing
Written by Mr Peter McClelland
Wednesday, 01 February 2012
|
|
|
Should it partner up with a sport seen to cause health problems, even if attendance at fights is said to be aimed at minimising damage and ensuring compliance with ‘safety’ rules? Is it legitimising a sport that should be banned and where do you draw the line, if at all, on the types of contact or combat sports? More in the genre for doctors, intervention in rugby has changed the way the sport is refereed and played to minimise head and spinal injuries but both can still happen. Rugby team doctors are an integral part of the sport and much admired. With boxing, it is somewhat difficult to take the high ground when the sport consists of opponents trying to punch each other unconscious! Yet it is not so long back that Police and Citizen Youth Clubs were where you went to learn the art of “sparring” or boxing, amongst other things.
Queensland is not going to introduce combat sports legislation, despite the recent death of an amateur boxer. All other states except Tasmania have controls in what is a fast-growing industry, fuelled by on-line testosterone-fuelled bouts and increasingly graphic depiction of violence generally. Legislation can assist with the health and safety of combatants, protect against blood-borne infections, ensure there is accreditation of coaches and officials and minimise exploitative event management. And none of that requires a doctor. The closer you get to the ringside, the more difficult decisions become.
|



